<img src="https://ws.zoominfo.com/pixel/6169bf9791429100154fc0a2" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;">

CyberArk vs. Thycotic (Delinea): Which Solution is Better?

Summary: In this article, we’ll compare two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions: CyberArk vs. Thycotic (Delinea), with a closer look at what they are, how they work, and which will best fit your organization. We’ll explore product summaries, use cases, pros and cons, PAM features, and pricing to that by the end of this article, you’ll have a clearer understanding of how these PAM tools work and be able to choose the one that’s right for you.

With the growing rate of cybercrime, keeping your business and its valuable information safe is now more critical than ever. An effective Privileged Access Management (PAM) solution can help protect your organization from cyberattacks such as brute force, SQL injection, mishandling of sensitive information, and compliance risks.

Organizations need a reliable way to monitor and manage access to resources without disrupting productivity. So, CyberArk vs. Thycotic—which PAM solution is better? Let’s find out.

What is CyberArk?

CyberArk is an identity access management solution that enables organizations to protect, control, and manage privileged accounts and credentials in a cloud-based, on-premises, or hybrid environment. With CyberArk Privileged Access Management, you can manage information and assign security credentials for your applications and sensitive programs.

CyberArk Product Summary

CyberArk PAM provides database and server access to privileged users on engineering or IT teams. It contains features like a password vault and privileged access manager that allow companies to focus on protecting privileged accounts. 

CyberArk Use Cases

CyberArk helps organizations:

  • Secure privileged credentials in a vault
  • Manage encryption keys
  • Rotate credentials based on policies
  • Monitor and record privileged sessions
  • Control access to SSL/SSH certificates
  • Manage third-party/remote access

CyberArk Pros & Cons

CyberArk may be a reliable choice for large enterprises, as it offers:

  • Extensive product capabilities 
  • On-premises and cloud data deployment
  • User analytics and reporting 
  • Threat detection

However, the tool can be difficult to implement. Challenges include:

  • Complex installation requiring expert product knowledge
  • Old-school graphical user interface (GUI) design that is hard to navigate
  • Complex pricing model 
  • Limited support for modern databases
  • Lack of support for Kubernetes and other containerized solutions

What is Thycotic?

Thycotic (alongside Centrify) is now known as Delinea. Thycotic PAM helps companies prevent ransomware and security threats by managing administrative rights and enforcing least privilege access to privileged accounts.

Thycotic Product Summary

Thycotic manages privileged user access to applications, servers, database management systems, and other resources through a centralized authentication process. This PAM tool provides password rotation and an encrypted secret vault to store keys and credentials.

Thycotic Use Cases

Thycotic PAM helps organizations:

  • Store secrets and credentials such as passwords and usernames
  • Monitor server sessions
  • Rotate passwords
  • Log user activity
  • Manage privileged access to networks, servers, applications, and databases

Thycotic Pros & Cons

Thycotic PAM is robust and flexible, providing efficient privileged access security through comprehensive audits and behavior analytics. Its benefits include:

  • Straightforward secrets management 
  • Effective session management features
  • Clear documentation
  • User-friendly interface

However, Thycotic falls short in modern computing environments. This PAM solution:

  • Offers poor support for modern databases
  • Requires installation on your server
  • Does not support Kubernetes deployments
  • Includes only limited third-party integrations

What is StrongDM, and Why Is It Better Than CyberArk and Thycotic?

Traditional PAM solutions fall short when it comes to onboarding and offboarding, compliance, credential sharing, and tool integration. These tools have too narrow a scope, and their implementation, troubleshooting, and upgrading can be complex with a need for extensive product-specific training. 

Furthermore, PAM tools can be difficult to implement without hindering productivity. Our recent Access-Productivity Report found that infrastructure access affects the productivity of 64% of companies. This means that unnecessary delay or access to the required resources wastes time and money. 

StrongDM offers secure access that puts your people first. It moves beyond PAM to provide technical staff with role-based, attributed-based, and just-in-time access to the critical infrastructure they need to do their jobs. 

StrongDM simplifies workflows and improves productivity while maintaining organizational security. It manages and audits access to resources using a zero-trust model, helping prevent the cyberattacks associated with unlimited and un-revoked privileges. 

With straightforward pricing, custom tool integrations, and excellent customer support, StrongDM is an excellent choice for businesses of all sizes

So, Which One Should You Choose? 

Here’s a quick review of the key features to help you decide.

  CyberArk Thycotic StrongDM
Best for Enterprises Small to medium-sized businesses Enterprises and start-ups looking to scale
Setup Complex, requires product-specific expertise Simple implementation Simple, fast implementation
Navigation Outdated GUI is difficult to navigate Simple, user-friendly interface Intuitive, user-friendly design
Modern database support Limited Limited Broad support for legacy, modern, and cloud-based datasources
Kubernetes support No No Yes
Installation Requires product expertise. Must be installed on your server Must be installed on your server No installation required on your server
Documentation Documentation is technical and overly complex Good documentation Excellent documentation
Customer support Offers only limited support Offers year-round support on premium packages only Offers 24/7/365 support to all users
Pricing CyberArk offers a 30-day free trial.

The pricing model is complex, requiring a custom plan from the sales team.
Thycotic offers a 30-day free trial.

Requires a custom pricing plan from the sales team.
StrongDM gives a 14-day free trial.

It has a single, straightforward pricing plan — $70 per user per month.

Are you looking for a People-First way to manage privileged access? Book your demo of StrongDM today.

About the Author

, Director, Global Customer Engineering, has worked in the information security industry for 20 years on tasks ranging from firewall administration to network security monitoring. His obsession with getting people access to answers led him to publish Practical Vulnerability Management with No Starch Press in 2020. He holds a B.A. in Philosophy from Clark University, an M.A. in Philosophy from the University of Connecticut, and an M.S. in Information Management from the University of Washington. To contact Andy, visit him on LinkedIn.

logo
💙 this post?
Then get all that strongDM goodness, right in your inbox.

You May Also Like

Alternatives to ManageEngine PAM360
Alternatives to ManageEngine PAM360
ManageEngine’s PAM360 gives system administrators a centralized way to manage and audit user and privileged accounts within network resources. However, teams that need to manage secure access to Kubernetes environments or enforce password policies within their privileged access management (PAM) system may want to consider other options. This blog post will cover ManageEngine PAM 360 and some solid alternatives, along with the pros and cons of each.
Cloudflare Access alternative
Alternatives to Cloudflare Access
Cloudflare Access is a Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) SaaS application that works with identity providers and endpoint protection platforms to enforce access policies for corporate applications, private IP spaces, and hostnames. It aims to prevent lateral movement and reduce VPN reliance. However, if you're looking to enable fast, secure access to your stack - with complete audit trails - Cloudflare Access might not be the best solution for your requirements.
Pomerium alternatives
Alternatives to Pomerium
Pomerium is an "identity-aware proxy" which aims to disrupt the VPN industry. Pomerium works on just about any device, providing remote access management solutions for individuals to enterprise level companies. Pomerium works as a SASE solution which allows users to manage authentication and authorization of any internal or third party application. Essentially, Pomerium adds SSO capabilities to just about any application. However, if you're looking for a more robust way to manage access to databases and Kubernetes clusters, Pomerium might not be the best solution for your needs. This blog post will take a look at a few alternatives and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each.
Perimeter 81 alternatives
Alternatives to Perimeter 81
Perimeter 81 is a cloud-based Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) platform that provides centralized access to local networks, applications, and cloud resources. The company takes a security-first approach and aims to disrupt the VPN industry by offering a simple and scalable network access alternative for organizations of all sizes. However, if you're looking for a more reliable and enterprise-ready solution to manage access to infrastructure, Perimeter 81 might not be the best solution for your needs. This blog post will take a look at a few alternatives and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each.
BeyondTrust alternatives
Alternatives to BeyondTrust
BeyondTrust FKA Bomgar is an access management and endpoint security solution which provides end user access and monitoring for a variety of platforms and devices including: Linux, Windows, Mac, Unix, and other mobile and cloud platforms. BeyondTrust has a host of solutions in privileged identity & access management, privileged remote access and vulnerability management. However, if you're looking for a simple and secure way to manage access to databases, Kubernetes clusters, or other internal web applications, BeyondTrust might not be the best solution to fit your needs. This blog post will take a look at a few alternatives and break down the pros and cons of each.