StrongDM vs
CyberArk
-
Total PAM Replacement
-
No More License Rotations
-
Supports Every Protocol
-
Just-in-Time - All the Time
We were a Legacy PAM house for years, but as the number of cross-functional users increased, it became a headache. We were constantly juggling licenses, and the user experience did not meet expectations... That’s something we just don't have to worry about anymore with StrongDM.”
William Vu, Infrastructure Network
Security Manager, Bullhorn
4.8
Customer satisfaction on Gartner and G2
|
||||||||||
|
COMPLETENESS OF OFFERING |
|
|||||||||
|
EASE OF USE |
|
|||||||||
|
SECURITY |
|
|||||||||
|
PRICING |
|
I've always been impressed with the support team and the engagement at StrongDM. We work with a lot of different vendors (at least 20 or 30). Honestly, I think StrongDM is by far the easiest vendor to interact with from a reliability standpoint, support, and new features that get rolled out.
What Is StrongDM?
StrongDM is a proxy that combines authentication, authorization, networking, and observability into a single product. The product is designed to unify and simplify privileged access workflows by providing low-friction connectivity to every piece of infrastructure in your stack.
- DevOps: DevOps teams can provision and deprovision access to specific instances, servers, or databases, in a matter of clicks.
- Security & Compliance: Security and compliance teams gain full visibility into “who did what when” on each system, including video playback of what individual users have executed on specific systems. For compliance, full records are kept of “who was in each system and what were they doing” at any given point in time.
- Admins: Access to critical infrastructure can be granted and revoked quickly and easily, greatly simplifying user onboarding and offboarding, provisioning for third parties, and the ability to provide access for a specified period of time. Users, roles, and access are easily managed via an Admin UI (CLI available as well).
What Is CyberArk?
CyberArk’s Privileged Access Manager is designed to secure, manage, and monitor privileged accounts within an organization. End users are typically comprised of a small subset of the engineering or IT team and tend to be systems administrators (sysadmins) or databases administrators (DBAs). The toolset is designed primarily for legacy server operating systems, like Windows, or older database management systems, such as Oracle, Sybase, or DB2. It was originally designed to run on Windows workstations and integrate with LDAP and Active Directory. Access is typically done through a web interface or locally installed utility. Components of the system include a password vault, central policy manager, and privileged session manager. In most cases, CyberArk is able to provide an audit trail of queries and session replays.
StrongDM vs. CyberArk: Key Difference Explained
1. Agentless Architecture
StrongDM does not require agents to be installed on end resources. This means fewer administrative headaches in managing the solution and faster time-to-value for the product. CyberArk’s architecture requires seven servers, plus the CyberArk vault, to implement. Each component needs to be working in order for PAM to be implemented. This agent-based design makes it difficult to manage and exposes it to several places for failure. The complexity of deployment also requires professional services.
💡Make it easy: Agentless architecture makes it easy to deploy, manage, and maintain StrongDM. Enforce just-in-time (JIT) security policies to cloud-native and hybrid infrastructures. Try it yourself.
2. Scalability
StrongDM leverages a true cloud-first approach, making it easier to scale in a single environment across multiple regions. This is particularly important for large enterprises. CyberArk’s approach requires the installation and management of self-hosted components, and endpoint agents that add to the complexity of managing the solution and decreasing flexibility.
3. Vault Agnostic
StrongDM has its own native vault and also integrates with multiple third-party vaults. Credentials are never exposed to end users, securely encrypted and not retrievable after setup. This allows vendors flexibility in their vault vendor and leverage existing security investments. CyberArk requires companies to manage access strictly with the CyberArk Vault.
4. Breadth of Support
StrongDM has native protocol support for infrastructure on-premises or in the cloud, including cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and any cloud databases. CyberArk’s core focus is on legacy on-premises systems, such as RDP, SSH, IBM 3720, MMSQL. This limitation lacks access control and visibility into all your resources. Support for modern cloud and databases often requires plugins and professional services.
5. Just-in-Time Access
StrongDM supports Just-in-Time access to databases, cloud, servers, and clusters through Access Workflows. CyberArk is only able to support Just-in-Time access to a portion of the stack and does not support cloud managed databases or PaaS.
6. Total Cost of Ownership
StrongDM offers simple per user pricing, starting at $70/license, including secure access to all resource types. Deployment requires no professional services, and the agentless architecture makes it easy to implement, manage, and maintain. CyberArk’s products are some of the most expensive on the market, with a high total cost of ownership. CyberArk requires additional hardware costs, has high licensing costs and you need to buy Professional Services for deployment and management. Operational costs are high with multiple systems and components to maintain.
Is StrongDM a replacement for CyberArk, or can they be used together?
StrongDM can function both as a replacement for CyberArk and as a complementary solution, depending on your organization's specific needs.
Replacement: For organizations seeking a modern, cloud-native approach to Privileged Access Management (PAM), StrongDM offers an agentless architecture that simplifies deployment and management. It provides native protocol support for both on-premises and cloud infrastructures, including platforms like AWS, Azure, GCP, and Kubernetes. This broad support makes StrongDM a suitable alternative to traditional PAM solutions like CyberArk, especially for environments that prioritize scalability and ease of use.
Complementary Use: If your organization already utilizes CyberArk and seeks to enhance its capabilities, StrongDM can integrate with CyberArk's secret management solutions. For instance, StrongDM supports integration with CyberArk Conjur and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager (PAM), allowing you to leverage existing secret stores while benefiting from StrongDM's streamlined access workflows and comprehensive auditing features.
In summary, StrongDM offers flexibility to either replace or complement CyberArk, depending on your infrastructure requirements and strategic objectives.
Does StrongDM require agents to be installed on servers?
No, StrongDM operates without the need for agents on end resources. This agentless architecture reduces administrative overhead and simplifies deployment.
How does StrongDM handle privileged access differently from CyberArk?
StrongDM combines authentication, authorization, networking, and observability into a single platform. It provides low-friction connectivity to all infrastructure components, allowing for streamlined access provisioning and comprehensive visibility into user activities. CyberArk, on the other hand, often requires multiple components and focuses primarily on managing privileged accounts within legacy systems.
How difficult is it to deploy and manage CyberArk compared to StrongDM?
Deploying CyberArk can be complex due to its architecture, which may require multiple servers and components, as well as professional services for implementation. StrongDM's agentless design and cloud-first approach make it easier to deploy, manage, and maintain, often without the need for additional professional services.
How does the pricing of StrongDM compare to CyberArk?
StrongDM offers simple per user pricing, starting at $70/license, including secure access to all resource types. Deployment requires no professional services, and the agentless architecture makes it easy to implement, manage, and maintain. CyberArk’s products are some of the most expensive on the market, with a high total cost of ownership. CyberArk requires additional hardware costs, has high licensing costs and you need to buy Professional Services for deployment and management. Operational costs are high with multiple systems and components to maintain.