<img src="https://ws.zoominfo.com/pixel/6169bf9791429100154fc0a2" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;">

Curious about how StrongDM works? 🤔 Learn more here!

Search
Close icon
Search bar icon

Agent vs. Agentless Architectures in Access Management

See StrongDM in action →
Agent vs. Agent-less Architecture

Contents

Secure Access Made Simple

Built for Security. Loved by Devs.

  • Free Trial — No Credit Card Needed
  • Full Access to All Features
  • Trusted by the Fortune 100, early startups, and everyone in between

Agent vs. Agentless architectures is a recurring debate - covering specifics from monitoring to security. But when it comes to Access Management, some key considerations are necessary when defining the scalability of your solution and its impact on efficiency and overhead over time.

Agent-based Access Management: Welcome to the World of Agent++

One of the biggest challenges with using agents for Access Management is they inherently require a 1:1 ratio of agent to infrastructure. In an Access Management context, that means you must have an agent on every piece of infrastructure if you hope to streamline access across your environment. We call this Agent++.

What is Agent++?

Agent++ is the continuous act of adding agents to every piece of infrastructure to provide streamlined access, due to the need to have a 1:1 ratio of agents to systems. That means:

  • You need an agent installed on every existing system.
  • You need an agent installed on every new system.
  • You need to update every agent on every system over time. 

The result is an endless loop: New system. New agent. New system. New agent. Found an old system? New agent.

In Access Management, “Agent++” means you’ve suddenly traded managing access at a system-by-system level to managing agents on a system-by-system level. Sure, you may have gained some efficiencies, but you’ve also introduced a slew of new challenges.

Agents, Overhead and their Impact on Efficiency

When the implementation process for a tool is complicated and time-consuming, that doesn’t bode well for you over time. This is where most people begin to recognize the issues with an agent-based approach to access management, because once you’ve taken inventory of all of your systems, you now have to install agents on every system.

And that’s just the starting point. The challenges associated with an agent-based approach to Access Management will compound over time. For example:

  • Due to the agent-based need to be on every single system, the initial implementation may be a lengthy process, delaying your team’s ability to quickly and easily access infrastructure.
  • Onboarding new systems will require individual agents to be installed on every one, every time.
  • Since agents share resources with the systems they’re installed on, they compete for resources with your critical systems.
  • You’ll eventually need to upgrade every agent over time - a process that will only become more complicated and time-consuming with every new system you add.

Relying on agents will dramatically impact the efficiency and productivity of your development and security teams – and not in a good way. 

Access Management: Agents vs. Agentless

Access Management is inherently an additive process. Access must be provided and managed for new, existing, and shadow (assuming you find them) systems in your infrastructure. That means that the ability to easily onboard and manage systems is critical.

Agent-based architectures are detrimental to this goal in a few key ways: 

  • There is an inability to dynamically add systems with minimal delay and overhead. 
  • Resources are required to manage agents over time. 
  • There is higher development overhead. 

Conversely, agentless architectures do not have many of those issues. By going agentless, it becomes significantly easier to add and remove new systems, there is no resource conflict between infrastructure and agents, and you no longer have to be concerned with managing or updating agents on every single system in your infrastructure. 

The combination of agentless benefits ultimately means less overhead, less impact on efficiencies over time, and now you no longer need to worry about Agent++. 

Agent++ in the Wild: One company’s struggle with agents, upgrades, and access

One StrongDM customer in the software development space had this exact issue - the company was using a tool that required agents to be installed on every new system. But because the company was growing rapidly, managing the scale and complexity of the deployment quickly became overwhelming, with one team lead stating, “You’d think a company full of really good engineers could get the solution deployed quickly - but it turned out to really be a burden.”

The organization struggled to keep up with the agents as new systems were added, when new people would join with new machines, and also when it came time to upgrade. “Every time we upgrade, there’s a huge project just to upgrade everything at the same time. We end up having to limp along.” And that was only working with three infrastructure tools, much less delivering streamlined access across the entire environment. This burden drove the company to explore other access solutions, including StrongDM (which they ultimately chose).

Want to see how agentless access management can help your organization? Sign up for a free trial or demo of StrongDM and see. 🙂

Dominic Garcia

About the Author

, Technical Marketing Expert, has held marketing leadership roles for Silicon Valley technology companies specializing in database, data management, and data analytics solutions. As head of content marketing at Splunk, Dominic contributed to boosting the company’s market visibility and its growth from a $100M to a $1.3B company. He brings relentless creativity to the task of connecting people with technical products to improve their lives. Dominic holds a B.S. degree in Public Relations from the University of Texas at Austin. To contact Dominic, visit him on LinkedIn.

💙 this post?
Then get all that StrongDM goodness, right in your inbox.

You May Also Like

Hackers Don’t Hack In. They Log In.
Hackers Don’t Hack In. They Log In.
Most breaches don’t begin with hacking—they start with logging in. Discover how compromised credentials fuel modern cyberattacks and why Zero Trust Privileged Access is essential for securing today’s identity-driven environments.
A New Era of Vault-Agnostic Secrets Management Is Here
A New Era of Vault-Agnostic Secrets Management Is Here
Discover why traditional secrets management isn't enough. StrongDM Managed Secrets offers vault-agnostic, Zero Trust security with secretless access, dynamic policy enforcement, automated rotation, and unified audits—perfect for complex enterprise environments.
Security vs. Compliance: How to Align The Differences
Security vs. Compliance: How to Align The Differences
Security breaches make headlines, while compliance audits keep teams on edge. The pressure to protect data and meet regulatory requirements is mounting—and often, the lines between security and compliance get blurred. Are they the same thing? Are they working in tandem—or pulling in different directions? This post breaks it down: what security and compliance are, how they intersect, where they differ, and most importantly, how your organization can align the two effectively.
User Access Reviews: Best Practices & Process Checklist
User Access Review Checklist: Best Practices & Automation
As teams grow and roles shift, it’s easy for permissions to get out of sync. That’s where user access reviews come in—they ensure every employee, vendor, or service account has exactly the access they need, and nothing more.Regular reviews reduce risk, prevent privilege creep, and help meet compliance requirements like SOX, ISO 27001, and HIPAA. But manual reviews? They’re slow, messy, and often incomplete.This guide breaks down the essentials of access reviews—what they are, why they matter, and how to make them painless with real-time visibility, automated workflows, and just-in-time access controls.
What Is Secrets Management? Best Practices
What Is Secrets Management? Best Practices for 2025
Secrets management is the practice of securely storing, accessing, and controlling digital authentication credentials such as passwords, API keys, certificates, and tokens used by applications and systems. It ensures that sensitive information is protected from unauthorized access, while supporting automation, compliance, and security across modern infrastructure.